SEQUENCE · DOSING

Continuous Dosing Refill Sequence: Valve, Horn and Feeder Interlocks

Refill is more than opening a valve. It is a short state machine that must replenish material without corrupting the weight signal or the normal flow-control loop.

RefillValveHornFeederInterlock

Why one IF statement is not enough

If the refill valve opens immediately whenever weight is low, material impact and mechanical vibration can disturb the load-cell signal. If the kg/h controller keeps reacting to that disturbed signal, it may control the refill transient instead of true consumption.

Refill state flow
LOW LEVEL→REFILL REQUEST→VALVE OPEN→SETTLE→CONTROL RESUME

Separate states to make the logic readable

States such as M20=Normal, M21=Refill and M22=Settle make it clear which outputs are allowed and which calculations are temporarily held. The horn can be tied to a specific refill event, while feeder behavior—continue, slow down or stop—should be an explicit process decision.

Minimum interlocks

  • Force the valve closed at high-weight or upper-limit condition
  • Block automatic refill if load-cell or analog validity is lost
  • Alarm if valve feedback disagrees with the commanded state
  • Hold or separately treat flow calculation during the post-refill settle window
  • Stop and E-stop override every refill state

The return condition matters most

Many problems appear not when refill starts, but when the machine returns to normal control. Decide whether valve-closed is sufficient or whether weight-rate stability and a minimum settle timer must also be satisfied before kg/h control resumes.

Commissioning should include material fall time, valve response, dust and mechanical load-cell vibration, not only the PLC state logic.
ENGINEER DISCUSSION

How would you design it in the field?

Challenge the sequence, interlocks, addressing or commissioning assumptions. Posts and replies appear only after moderation.

Server rate limit · moderated before publication

Loading engineer discussion…